Friday, October 21, 2016

Calling Windy Weather: Hillary and Trump

Yesterday in the afternoon, ripples without crests began the stirring. It did not arrive all of a sudden but a sense of what the wind can do whispered sonic guises low and temperamental. I sat down listening for the outside and the wind began her rise. I sat down inside on a windy day in October in Australia. I was rather ready. We all expected a showdown of sorts. I even went so far as to imagine the scene, all in the middle of a great golden Bonanza set on horseback with complementary gun-smoke at the Ponderosa theme park. And we all got an invite! The whole world.  After all America’s such a long way from here and it’s easy to see everything from afar as a flat pack you never get to assemble properly. At times there’s that feeling you arrived to a film after forgetting to bring three dimensional glasses, don’t you think?  I even went so far as to savour the moment at first. What’s not better than a great antipodes in point of view while a raging, fight to the tooth and nail and down to the wire, kind of deliberation blazes wild. I suppose, contextually speaking, it was perhaps always going to feel this way. You know, all of it was brewing for so many long months and all of it different to the politics of home where I live. Days upon days, upon weeks, upon months of achingly expensive campaigning. It all seemed, in part,  to have become a microcosm of war itself , in all its seedy revolt and sad divisions. You know I expected a show down but I never expected to feel so very sad.
 The wind seemed to hear me too, on the roof turning home into a child’s rattle, at the windows like blind memories escalating, smudging the borders between music and noise. I love the wind – restorative and an experience worth going far to see, as the naturalist W.H. Hudson, once suggested. The wind also seemed to feel the depths of a tiny rectangle in my living room where Hillary and Donald would fight to the mistral of a most fierce and rather frightening battle and I have to say, in my lifetime, the most divided of all political debates. I’m quite certain that kind of politics is not what the world needs right now.I’m a woman-once a girl, many times privy to the double standards my sisters (and brothers and others) have faced and fought against in the road towards gender equality. I love history. I absolutely love history. History is like the ultimate scholar. History has been there. History knows. History has given us the keys to our future. History has taught us about love and history has made a lot of mistakes. We need to listen to history. History has opened us up to opportunity and choices. History has told us that women do better, as all human beings do, where choices are available and free to make, where shaming and blaming is removed from the dialogue and where decision making is seen as an individually important and complex process with loving arms at the ready. History has taught us that any person coming at politics with fundamentalism and a “blanket rule” on deeply emotional and seriously psychological issues surrounding a woman’s body, will cause harm within, what is, in fact, a very socially irresponsible and forcibly religious approach.  If we are to go back in history it is to see where this kind of doctrine suppressed women, had women’s health placed at risk, had children born to a cruel fate (google F.A.S for a start) where traditionally the bucked stopped at them and still does in fact! History tells us that the rate at which young women are left as the primary caregiver to an unplanned pregnancy (or even one that is planned!) is grossly disproportionate to the rate at which a man takes hold of his responsibilities in love and equal care. This is a fact. Until Donald Trump has conceived a child, given birth, raised a child as a sole parent on the poverty line I do not want to hear another word form him on this issue.I say this in the context of where the debate reached cyclone proportions. The twister arrived for sure as though Dorothy was up on the top looking down for a birds -eye view of a place much bigger than Kansas, building momentum and funnelling this way and that through the Middle East. Yeah and if Dorothy had of been there she would have realized her kind of displacement paled into insignificance then. Sanctity of human life? Wowsers, tell that to the many thousands upon thousands of human beings who have lost their loves, their life force, their reason to be here on Earth, while a war rages in the belly of a dogs guts, determined in the darkness of everything futile. And Mr Trump wants to return with troupes ready for combat? What Trump seems not to understand is that ISIS exists, partially as a consequence of young angry Iraqis renouncing the intrusion of American forces into their country. So sending US troupes back, in the way he seemed to be suggesting, will only again further inflame the situation, not to mention his deamonizing of the Muslim faith. He will almost certainly make America and it’s allies a greater target for Muslim extremism.

In the buffeting gale, the back and forth between a woman who is already working in a related field of expertise, that being in foreign policy as the Secretary of State to a man who isn’t, when pressed on his feelings about Mr Putin the response seemed rather casual and congenial where I myself began to cry on the lounge-room floor. I write from the truest place without feeling over-bloated with sentiment. Did he forget? It seemed to me Mr Trump was running into very dangerous territory here, not realising the seriousness of Syria’s plight in which Russia supported the Assad regime whose blanket bombing of Aleppo is causing a humanitarian disaster, endangering the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. Remember this, thousands of innocent civilians are trapped in this warzone. People are starving, people are without electricity and water, people are mourning the loss of life and the loss of love. No mention of human life and emotion and the ache of loss was documented in these moments. It should have been! 

I’m sure pitting Donald Trump against Hillary Clinton served western economies very well. In his, to the very right alliances with the gun lobby and christian pro lifer’s and border control extremists, it was clear a media circus could prevail and bolster the coffers for those in the business of owning the news. But It wasn’t in the best interests of peace. We need peace. We need togetherness. Hillary speaks of this. She has also has the experience from the community out to understand how to be a peacemaker.

Make America great again? Let’s think bigger than that please. Let’s come together to find peaceful solutions from home to far and wide and everywhere. All of us. It’s not an easy suggestion in a globalised world, but it’s possible. It’s everyone’s job and we can help in our own ways by practicing love, peacefulness, togetherness, understanding and inclusive practice, by talking, by putting our weapons away and finding fair solutions. We need to keep trying. Even Yoda makes mistakes. There is a try and it’s ours for today and tomorrow. The answers are blowing in the wind. Let’s find them. NOW…


No comments:

Post a Comment